|
David Linthicum on Changing the Enterprise
David S. Linthicum is a managing partner with Zapthink, a consulting and advisory organization dedicated to SOA planning, implementation, training, mentoring and strategy. He is a well-known application integration and SOA expert who has authored 10 books on related topics. See More by David Linthicum Enterprise Architects Must Plan for SaaS
This week I'm speaking at the Open Group Enterprise Architecture Practitioners Conference in San Francisco. I did the Keynote presentation at the summer conference in Austin, Texas, and will be providing the Keynote at this conference as well. So, what does enterprise architecture have to do with SaaS? Plenty, and those who plan, work, and build their enterprise architectures today will ignore SaaS at their peril. SaaS fits into enterprise architecture as any application would. Other systems, new and old, have to interact with SaaS-delivered systems and they are indeed part of the architecture. Many enterprise architects are in denial about this fact and ignore the use of SaaS, in essence, considering it a Web site rather than an enterprise application. Can't do that. Indeed, the use of SaaS will only expand as the years go on, and many Global 2000 enterprises could find that 20 percent to 30 percent of their enterprise applications are SaaS-delivered and need to function like any other enterprise system, working and playing well with others — users, legacy systems, etc. There are a few key tricks that make this synergy easy: First, make sure to consider SaaS applications when defining common semantic models that span the enterprise. In many instances they are left out of that analysis and suffer, as a result, for a lack of integration with existing systems and no common mechanism for dealing with SaaS as abstract and common data. Second, define the interfaces (APIs and Web services) that the SaaS vendors provide. Do this before you select a vendor, not after. Many enterprise architects are stuck with SaaS-delivered systems that have no clear way of talking to other systems. If you find yourself in this situation, you'll have a great deal of work ahead of you. Finally, consider SaaS when doing long-term planning. SaaS systems are going to change and morph over time, and they will be very different than they are today. Thus, work with your provider and make sure they hear you, and you hear them, as far as future direction is concerned. In short, consider SaaS when planning for the next generations of your enterprise architecture. E-MAIL | SLASHDOT | DIGG This is a public forum. CMP Technology and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. CMP Technology makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers. Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of CMP Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in CMP Technology's Terms of Service. Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.
|
Blog Channels
Cindi Howson on Business Intelligence The Brain Food Blogger Tony Byrne on Content Management SQL Puzzlers by Joe Celko Rajan Chandras on IT & Information Management Seth Grimes on Analytics In Context by Doug Henschen Phil Kemelor on Web Analytics Sandy Kemsley's Column Two Nelson King on Enterprise App Development David Linthicum on Software as a Service Natural Insight, By Mark Madsen Alan Pelz-Sharpe on Content Management Mark Smith on Performance Management Neil Raden on Business Intelligence Bruce Silver on Business Process Management Product Maven Subscribe to RSS Archives
|
|
|












