CMP -- United Business Media

Intelligent Enterprise

Better Insight for Business Decisions

UBM
Intelligent Enterprise - Better Insight for Business Decisions
Part of the TechWeb Network
Intelligent Enterprise
search Intelligent Enterprise




The Upside of BI Market Consolidation | Intelligent Enterprise Blog
Competing on Decisions, by Neil Raden
Neil Raden is a consultant and analyst and a partner and co-founder of Smart (enough) Systems LLC, a research and advisory firm specializing in analytics, business Intelligence and decision management. He is also the co-author of the book "Smart (Enough) Systems." Write him at neil@smartenoughsystems.com.
See More by Neil Raden

The Upside of BI Market Consolidation

Posted by Neil Raden
Friday, March 2, 2007
3:12 PM

Other analysts are preoccupied with the Oracle/Hyperion deal, but I'm not. There are so many important things to keep on top of that the financial doings of the industry are only secondary interests for me. After all, Hyperion itself is composed of three major companies – Arbor, Hyperion Software and Brio, some of which made major acquisitions of their own, including Brio's purchase of Scribe (SQR). This is just another step in an endless process. Some worry about consolidation of the market. I don't. There are dozens of companies waiting in the wings to become the next Hyperion.

While many wring their hands over whether this is good for the market or not, and worry about whether certain products will get thrown under the bus (like Express, for example), the reality is plain as day – the products don't matter. What matters in a software company is execution. These mergers are usually about buying either a client list, a sales force or maintenance revenue stream (or in rare circumstances, if you're rich enough, to buy a competitor and euthanize them).

What creates value in a software company is the ability to monetize the technology. Bob Earle and Jim Dorian created Essbase. Diaz Nesamoney and Guarav Dhillon created Informatica. Mike Saylor and Sanju Bansal created Microstrategy. What made those software products valuable was the successful marketing and sales efforts that turned them all into nine-figure companies.

Ultimately, this will be good for the industry, as lots of talented people will be cut loose to seek their destiny elsewhere. Will the continued consolidation of BI act like a damper on innovation? I doubt it. First, BI is too important to organizations to stagnate. There will always be a receptive market for a better idea. Second, BI as we know it is in the late adopter phase anyway, and this acquisition is a BI 1.0 play, not a BI 2.0 play, like Cognos' acquisition of Celequest was. The real action will be in Operational BI, not BPM.

Neil Raden is the founder of Hired Brains, providers of consulting, research and analysis in Business Intelligence, Performance Management, real-time analytics and information/semantic integration. Don't miss Neil's many insightful articles in the Intelligent Enterprise archive.



E-MAIL | SLASHDOT | DIGG




This is a public forum. CMP Technology and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. CMP Technology makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of CMP Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in CMP Technology's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.


 




    Subscribe to RSS