|
The Little Guys' Head Start
"Standardization." It's a big word in business intelligence ever since organizations of all sizes stepped back, looked at the number of BI tools they were using, and realized it was, in a phrase, too many. Analytics once were carried out on a project-by-project or system-by-system basis. You undertook a new business initiative, and then you put a BI tool in place to monitor the new data stream the initiative created. And one-off BI worked fine. Until it turned out that it was difficult, if not impossible, to get an overall picture of the organization's data, because information was spread out over many silos and being examined by tools that were never designed to interact with one another. So the BI standardization movement is afoot. And here's something interesting: It turns out that it's the medium-sized businesses, not the big ones, that have a head start at bringing their BI technology down to a more manageable level. According to The Data Warehousing Institute, companies with revenue of more than $5 billion annually use, on average, 3.7 BI tools. Businesses with sales in the range of $500 million to $5 billion have 3.1 BI packages. But the smaller firms--those with revenue of less than $500 million--use an average of only 2.3. So as far as standardization goes, the smaller firms are ahead in the race. In short, they've got a lot less work to do than their big, cash-flushed rivals. As an Intelligent Enterprise story we bring you this week shows, that's not their only BI advantage. It also turns out that medium-sized firms have compiled the same business intelligence wish lists as their larger competitors. They want better BI, and they want to analyze more than just customer data. To that end, they're investing in more infrastructure and searching for new data sources, from both within and without. Smaller firms shouldn't consider themselves at a disadvantage when it comes to business intelligence. Instead, they should focus on their advantages and make the most of them. E-MAIL | SLASHDOT | DIGG This is a public forum. CMP Technology and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. CMP Technology makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers. Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of CMP Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in CMP Technology's Terms of Service. Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.
|
Blog Channels
Cindi Howson on Business Intelligence The Brain Food Blogger Tony Byrne on Content Management SQL Puzzlers by Joe Celko Rajan Chandras on IT & Information Management Seth Grimes on Analytics In Context by Doug Henschen Phil Kemelor on Web Analytics Sandy Kemsley's Column Two Nelson King on Enterprise App Development David Linthicum on Software as a Service Natural Insight, By Mark Madsen Alan Pelz-Sharpe on Content Management Mark Smith on Performance Management Neil Raden on Business Intelligence Bruce Silver on Business Process Management Product Maven Subscribe to RSS Archives
|
|
|












